Archive for the ‘Threskeia’ Category


Catholic Member, Self-proclaimed Greek Linguist: Real or Geek?

May 28, 2015

I thank God on this.

The more they pull the string and accuse Bro. Eli of no-basis- language illiteracy, this time it seems it turns around, the real ignorant in language of Greek reveals. Thanks to internet!

In one of many post of Bro. Eli Soriano in his blogsite, he once more refuted the Catholic teaching of calling the head of their church “pope” or “father”, which Biblically contradicts Christ’s teaching as written in,


And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.


According to Bro. Eli, the Roman Catholic Church authorities used the other English version of the Bible to suffice their false doctrines, despising the prohibition of using other English version. The phrase they referred as basis of their doctrine is “I became your father” wherein the Catholic Bible is translated as “I begotten you”:




On Bro. Eli’s blog, referring to interlinear Greek translation of “begotten”, Greek text 1080 is translated as;




From a variation of G1085; to procreate (properly of the father, but by extension of the mother); figuratively to regenerate: – bear, beget, be born, bring forth, conceive, be delivered of, gender, make, spring.


Unacceptable to RCC followers, one self-claimed Greek expert contested Bro. Eli and accused him of Biblical Greek ignorance. He said Bro. Eli did not understand Greek word ἐγέννησα (egennēsa) and just only understand γεννάω (gennaō) of Greek Lexicon. According to this self-claimed expert, the Greek translation of the verse is:


Greek nT



Is Bro. Eli incorrect in using the Greek word “γεννάω (gennaō)”?

Or only the fault-finder mind thinks of it.


Referring to e-sword,,




By pointing to G1080 to look for meaning of , it will shows,




Do we have problem on this?

Or again for the mind who only thinks is to bring the good man down – things are gone wrong always. Tsk. Tsk.

Lets back to this geek self-proclaim.

So what is ἐγέννησα (egennēsa) in Interlinear Greek New Testament?


interlinear greek1  1 cor 4.15


By clicking G1080,


interlinear greek2  1 cor 4.15


Let’s click G5656 now,


interlinear greek3  1 cor 4.15


What is an AORIST TENSE?

The aorist tense is characterized by its emphasis on punctiliar action; that is, the concept of the verb is considered without regard for past, present, or future time. There is no direct or clear English equivalent for this tense, though it is generally rendered as a simple past tense in most translations.

The events described by the aorist tense are classified into a number of categories by grammarians. The most common of these include a view of the action as having begun from a certain  point (“inceptive aorist”), or having ended at a certain point
(“cumulative aorist”), or merely existing at a certain point (“punctiliar aorist”). The categorization of other cases can be found in Greek reference grammars.

The English reader need not concern himself with most of these  finer points concerning the aorist tense, since in most cases they cannot be rendered accurately in English translation, being fine points of Greek exegesis only. The common practice
of rendering an aorist by a simple English past tense should suffice in most cases.


We are not an expert here but we know how to read.   Thanks to Mr. Google. Thanks be to GOD. Even they boast how good they are in Greek language, the concept of the Bible is still shaded to them. Their eyes are covered with veils unless they accept the light.



It is saddening that intellectual people as they claimed they are, is use by evil spirits to admonish the truth written in the Bible. It is very clear that we should not call any men as our spiritual father but only our Father in heaven. If we are true Christians, we should follow our Christ, he calls every man who do the will of God as brothers, sisters and mothers – never father.


Mat_12:50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.



Now, it is up to us who to believe for our soul’s sake.


Catholic-apologetic spread lies again – Bro. Eli, MCGI is near end

October 17, 2014

So much of their fear and trembles in thinking their are decreasing in numbers, Hate blog of catholic-apologetic spreads lies again.

My reply to catholic-apologetic who hated Bro. Eli and MCGI.

October 17, 2014


As far as my memory serves me, the following are the charities MCGI involve with and continue doing with the help of God:

Clinic Ni Kuya

La Verdad Christian College for free-education

Mass Blood Letting



Action Center ni Kuya

UNTV 37 Rescue Team

Transient House

Home for the Aged/Senior Citizens

Home for Abandoned Babies

Bible Exposition/Mass Indoctrination


24/7 Community Prayer & broadcast

A Song of Praise

Tree Planting

Community Service /Clean-up Drive

Please visit this for more details:

With those charities mentioned above, I wonder why some such as catholic-apologetic Aloysius Kayiwa is blind to see these things-is he blinded by his false belief or he just opted to believe in hear-says and slack in verifying one’s accusation.

I was a catholic before and also felt bad about Bro. Eli Soriano the first time I heard him. It is quite he is attacking my belief, the Catholic faith where my families hold on to. I am furious with that man on television as I remembered watching him every night. But the good thing is, after I heard what he says and weighted as far as my morals is concerned, I found that he speak nothing but the truth in the Bible. I also remembered that I am not a Bible reader before, our Bible is just a display in the altar made by my father. And the rest is history, I am now a Christian, not only in lips but in spirit. Thanks be to God for His faith.

I learned how to love and to care to people, not only to those who love me but as well to those who do not show any compassion, enemies are may be. So how come this apologetic is shouting so much that we the MCGI-members shows no compassion to our fellow-men, for non-MCGI members? I think he is talking to himself and to his co-catholic members and he is just afraid to accept the truth that they are impliedly spreading hates not only to themselves, so much to non-Catholics. Their blogs speak what they are, they claiming the other way around.

If telling what were written in the Bible that affects their beliefs , the possibility is : once truth is speak out, lies are expose , and they felt bad about it and still embrace the belief even the Bible tells it is wrong, I think they are HARD-HEADED and ANTI-CHRIST. They do not want to listen to Lord Jesus Christ and what they want is to listen to a MAN (pope/priests) who delivers only man-made doctrines.


Understanding comes from God, this is undeniable, no one can contest. And God who made heaven and earth will not give understanding to wicked people, especially that of someone who will preach His words. So, that someone is not wicked and had chosen by God to understand and be His messenger to His people.

Whether they affirmed or not, understanding from God is given to Bro. Eli Soriano. And it is proven from the time he started his mission until now – the non-stop propagation of the gospel worldwide and the multiplying servants of God as result of his preaching is only partial evidence of prophecy of Christ.

And the understanding that the coming of Christ is near is no non-sense and not a tactic to spread fear to congregation or to people who had chance to listen to Bro. Eli’s preaching, but as part of the gospel is preparation for us to be more holy and vigilant.   This catholic- apologetic misunderstood our preparation to Christ’s near coming. For everybody’s information, MCGI members are not told by Bro. Eli nor Bro. Daniel to stop pursuing education or chosen profession just because the world is near to end. This is what the catholic-blog authored by Aloysus Kayiwa spreads in the net – LIES!

The truth is, MCGI-members are taught to stop loving and pursuing the material lust that this world is offer that may affect one’s salvation. It is the LUST of this world that we are encouraged to stop to pursue because the lusts of this world are not of to God of heaven but to evil. And that is God’s teaching so we follow.

Now, we are not surprised if someone like Aloysius will say Bro. Eli Soriano and the congregation is near to end – that was enemies’ prayer to their father-the devil. It is tantamount in saying stop doing goodness:

Stop preaching the word of God so that those blinded will not be enlighten anymore. Let be criminals increases their numbers and their victims as well.

Stop the mass blood- letting so that those who need blood to cure their illnesses be dead at once.

Stop giving free-medical, free-dental, free-ride, free-legal consultation to those who cannot afford so that they were be dead in tears.

Stop giving free-education to those who cannot afford but have will to survive poverty so that they will scattered in the streets and be counted as out-of-school people.

Stop giving free-transient home to homeless, senior citizens and abandoned children so that they will freeze in the middle of the night and be killed by madman.

Only devil do not want goodness. Are those who wanted these things to happen to Bro. Eli and MCGI devils’ advocate?

Yet, whoever desires to stop the goodness shows by Bro. Eli and MCGI to their fellow-men, God of the Bible has something to say:

Isaias 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:

You cannot bring the good man down, so much God’s people and His chosen messenger.

Note: Originally posted as comment to:


Sino ang babae sa Apocalipsis 12?

October 1, 2014

Sa paniniwala ng mga Catoliko-defensor tulad ni Atty. Marlwil Llasos na ang Assumption and coronation ni Maria ay Biblical,  ipinagpalagay nilang ang babae sa Apocalipsis 12 ay si Maria.


Apocalipsis 12: 1 At ang isang dakilang tanda ay nakita sa langit: isang babae na nararamtan ng araw, at ang buwan ay nasa ilalim ng kaniyang mga paa, at sa kaniyang ulo ay may isang putong na labingdalawang bituin;
2 At siya’y nagdadalang tao; at siya’y sumisigaw, na nagdaramdam sa panganganak, at sa hirap upang manganak.
3 At ang ibang tanda ay nakita sa langit: at narito, ang isang malaking dragong mapula, na may pitong ulo at sangpung sungay, at sa kaniyang mga ulo’y may pitong diadema.
4 At kinaladkad ng kaniyang buntot ang ikatlong bahagi ng mga bituin sa langit, at ipinaghagis sa lupa: at lumagay ang dragon sa harapan ng babaing manganganak na, upang lamunin ang kaniyang anak pagkapanganak niya.
5 At siya’y nanganak ng isang anak na lalake, na maghahari na may panghampas na bakal sa lahat ng mga bansa: at ang kaniyang anak ay inagaw na dinala hanggang sa Dios, at hanggang sa kaniyang luklukan.
6 At tumakas ang babae sa ilang, na doon siya’y ipinaghanda ng Dios ng isang dako, upang doon siya ampuning isang libo dalawang daan at anim na pung araw.



Si Maria nga ba ang nasa Apocalipsis 12?  At si Kristo nga ba ang batang lalaking ipinanganak niya?


Sa sulat ni Lucas, ito ang ating mababasa patungkol sa panganganak ni Maria:


Lucas 2: 1 Nangyari nga nang mga araw na yaon na lumabas ang isang utos mula kay Augusto Cesar, na magpatala ang buong sanglibutan.


2 Ito ang unang talaang-mamamayan na ginawa nang si Quirinio ay gobernador sa Siria.

3 At nagsisiparoon ang lahat upang sila’y mangatala, bawa’t isa sa kaniyang sariling bayan.

4 At si Jose naman ay umahon mula sa Galilea, mula sa bayan ng Nazaret, hanggang sa Judea, sa bayan ni David, na kung tawagi’y Bet-lehem, sapagka’t siya’y sa angkan at sa lahi ni David;
5 Upang patala siya pati ni Maria, na magaasawa sa kaniya, na kasalukuyang kagampan.
6 At nangyari, samantalang sila’y nangaroroon, at naganap ang mga kaarawang dapat siyang manganak.
7 At kaniyang ipinanganak ang panganay niyang anak na lalake; at ito’y binalot niya ng mga lampin, at inihiga sa isang pasabsaban, sapagka’t wala nang lugar para sa kanila sa tuluyan.


Kung sa panahon ni Agusto Cesar ipinanganak si Jesus, paanong sa Apocalipsis ay muli na naman siyang ipapanganak ni Maria?  At pagkapanganak ng babae, ang bata ay inagaw na dinala sa harap ng Dios, ngunit si Jesus na ipinanganak ni Maria ay lumaki at nangaral sa lupa bago pa siya bumalik sa langit.


Atty. Marlwil, heto na ang sagot sa tanong mo kung sino ang babae sa Apocalipsis 12, at kay Bro. Eli Soriano lang naman namin natutuhan ito.


Galacia 4: 22 Sapagka’t nasusulat, na si Abraham ay nagkaroon ng dalawang anak, ang isa’y sa aliping babae, at ang isa’y sa babaing malaya.
23 Gayon man ang anak sa alipin ay ipinanganak ayon sa laman; nguni’t ang anak sa babaing malaya ay sa pamamagitan ng pangako.
24 Ang mga bagay na ito’y may lamang talinghaga: sapagka’t ang mga babaing ito’y dalawang tipan; ang isa’y mula sa bundok ng Sinai, na nanganganak ng mga anak sa pagkaalipin, na ito’y si Agar.
25 Ang Agar ngang ito ay bundok ng Sinai sa Arabia, at ito’y katulad ng Jerusalem ngayon: sapagka’t ito’y nasa pagkaalipin kasama ng kaniyang mga anak.
26 Nguni’t ang Jerusalem na nasa itaas ay malaya, na siyang ina natin.


Ang Jerusalem na nasa langit, na malaya, ang siyang ina ng mga Kristiano.  At ang mga nalabi sa binhi ng babae ay inusig ng dragon.


Apocalipsis 12: 17 At nagalit ang dragon sa babae, at umalis upang bumaka sa nalabi sa kaniyang binhi, na siyang nagsisitupad ng mga utos ng Dios, at mga may patotoo ni Jesus:



Muli, ang paniniwala ng mga Katoliko patungkol sa Assumption at Coronation ni Maria ay walang basehang Biblical, gawa-gawa lamang.


Salamat sa Dios.




The Transitus Mariae is Heretic

September 16, 2014

More on assumption and coronation of Mary…..

Care to read please…


Transitus Mariae is Heretic


After reading, I wonder why still the Catholics believe in such heretic story as claimed by their own sources.  I do not know the author whether he is non-catholic or what, but as far as their own history is concern the  Assumption of Mary that came from Transitus Mariae is intentionally untrue.

Much more heretic Biblically speaking.

It is up to you to believe.






Assumption and coronation of Mary is not Biblical hence a Fallacy

September 15, 2014

Assumption and coronation of Mary is not Biblical hence a Fallacy

Roman Catholic Church is known for numerous false doctrines: rosary, baptism of the infants, purgatory, idol’s worship, mass, Eucharist, December 25, All Saints and All Souls Day, and many others that the Bible did not agree with.


Another dogma that the Bible did not consider is the Assumption and Coronation of Blessed Virgin Mary.   Let the Scriptures tell us the reason.




John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.


Dictionary defines assumption as the taking up of a person into heaven while ascension is the act of rising or ascending; the act of moving to a higher or more powerful position. Catholics church said by the power of God Mary’s assumption took place, on the other hand, it is by Christ’s power he ascended to heaven. Although ascension is different from assumption in terms of “whose will it is” as they implied, it is still clear that both terms directed into one place which is going up to heaven where the Almighty God is dwelt. And no man went to heaven, the Son of God does.



Remember the promise of our Lord Jesus Christ which is written in the Book of John,


Joh 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.


Joh 14:2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.


Joh 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.


I believed that Mary died in Christ, and those who died in Christ will rise first.


1Th 4:14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.


1Th 4:15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.


1Th 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:


A query about the assumption of Mary was asked to Bro. Eli in Bible Exposition Totoo bang si Birheng Maria ay iniakyat sa langit?”. 





Few years back I made comments/inquiries regarding the assumption and coronation of Mary in Atty. Marwil Llasos blog. I posted that since the event of assumption and coronation of Mary is not written in the Bible – it is not real, it is a mere addition and a false doctrine. And believing to false doctrine is detrimental to salvation.


Since Catholics believe on that dogma, I asked Atty. Marwil Llasos, a Catholic defender, for verses that will qualify his belief, because my belief is, all things needed for salvation is written in the Bible, and to be Biblically true, it must be written.


Atty. Llasos did not give verses to support his claims instead he gave me counter-argument – “Where in the Bible can we read that everything is in the Bible?”, wherein according to him my premise is invalid.


Lest Atty. Llasos forgot that we are verifying here the truthfulness of RCC dogma and not everything or something else. And it wise to think that to be Biblically true, a doctrine must be written or can be read in the Bible itself and not from any self-claimed letter from apostles or self-proclaimed saints by Catholics church.


According to, Assumption of Mary was the bodily taking up of the Virgin Mary into Heaven at the end of her earthly life. It is also called the falling asleep of Mary.


Bodily taking up or entering body into heaven (Wikipedia)- Is it possible that body of flesh and flood can enter heaven? Let’s read:


1Co 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.


Just to sufficed the assumption belief, Atty. Llasos said that I did not understand or I know not the Catholic doctrine because the body mentioned in that dogma is a glorified body like of our Lord after his resurrection. Let hear some words from, a catholic-page,


“Scripture does not give an account of Mary’s Assumption into heaven. Nevertheless, Revelation 12 speaks of a woman who is caught up in the battle between good and evil. Belief that Mary, without dying or shortly after death, has been taken up into Heaven with her body and her soul has been part of the teaching of the Catholic Church since the earliest centuries of Christianity. That early Christian believed in Mary’s Assumption is proven in the lack of her relics, empty tombs, the existence of Transitus Mariae stories, and quotes from early Christians.


Finally when she was 59 years old, Mary died A.D. 48. She had enough time to say goodbye to all the apostles before she died. The grieving apostles took her body to a tomb near the one that Jesus was laid in. They covered her with a white shroud and laid her to rest in the tomb. But Mary’s body didn’t stay there. Jesus came to her and took her body and soul into heaven to be with Him.”


The also posted this:


“The word Assumption comes from the Latin verb assumere, meaning “to take to oneself.” Our Lord, Jesus Christ took Mary home to himself where he is.

In the light of a long history of Christian belief since patristic times, in 1950, Pope Pius XII defined Mary’s Assumption into Heaven as a dogma of Roman Catholicism:

“the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heaven.”


(1)Whatever body (material or glorious) as Atty. Llasos claimed, the fact remains that  Scripture does not give an account of Mary’s Assumption into heaven – no wonder why Atty. Llasos is having hard time to give verses when asked because the assumption is no-where to be found in the Bible.  And yet, it is only 1950 when such belief was declared as dogma of the church.

(2) Due to lack of relics, empty tomb, existence of Transitus Mariae and quotes from early Christians – with these reason why Catholics believed such dogma is like an empty can because true Christians will not tell lies and make story that is not true.


Mat 19:18  He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,


(3) “Jesus came to her and took her body and soul into heaven to be with Him” and Our Lord, Jesus Christ took Mary home to himself where he is”, are both direct contradiction of the Lord’s words in John 14:1-3.

Joh 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.

Joh 14:2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

Joh 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

When will the Lord Jesus Christ coming and the dead in Christ will raise first?

This Q & A in a Bible Exposition of Bro. Eli Soriano will give you discernment about this – the question raised is May nakarating na bang tao sa langit?”


If the legal adviser, Atty. Llasos still insist that such dogma is Biblical, it is up to him.  He has all the right to believe and defend his (false) belief, on the other hand, we are here to defend the truth and expose lies for the sake of others.

And by the way, I am a proud member of Members Church of God International, or locally knows as Ang Dating Daan.  And the messenger sent by God in this dispensation that I am talking about in your blog Atty. Llasos is Bro. Eli Soriano.



A call for debate by Lackey: Speak Greek/ Hebrew Language Or You are Nothing? Sounds familiar.

September 10, 2014

I would like to post my comment on splendors blog dated 8/26/2014:

1. First is the challenge of Bro. Duane to Eli Soriano or Any member of ADD who are willing to appear in a neutral place for a gentleman Debate.


It is all said. Sensible indeed! By reading the link below (or this blog), for wise readers, we understand why Duane’s demand is HOPELESS.


But hey, I have an idea for Mr. Duane if he is sincere to open the eyes of people. Since Mr. Duane is hastily requesting a gentleman debate with Bro. Eli but cannot get an authority from his pope or higher superior:




Mr. Duane, if you really wanted to prove your brothers and sisters in faith and in the world that you are good in Hebrew and in Greek and that of recommendation of Bro. Eli is wrong, why not make a video or a blog proving yourself and of Bro. Eli is wrong in saying that the best English translation (truthful to original language) of the Bible is New Living Testament and Modern King James Version? Does not knowing the truth (if it’s a real truth) gave you an obligation to inform everyone that you think is misled by Bro. Eli since he made such recommendation? Why not tell us what version is the best English translation and truthful? And tell us why do you say so?


Jas 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.


I am hoping that your listeners and/or readers will understand what you are talking about and will sure get piece of good advice for their soul’s salvation. Peace!


2. Second is the response of Bro. Duane to Eli Soriano against the statement of Pope Francis.


I though Mr. Duane will wronged Bro. Eli, but what he did is he backed-up Bro. Eli in refuting pope’s pronouncement “Jesus is a man” when Duane show us this “Person of Jesus, who is true man and true God.”


Duane analyzed the video to prove his point – to prove his pope’s point – that Jesus is a man, not a spirit. In the video:


Pope’ said: He is the intercessor, the One who prays, pray to God with us and before us. Jesus has saved us, He gave us this great prayer, His sacrifices, His life to save us, to justify us: we are righteous through Him. Now he’s gone, but He still prays. Some ask, Is Jesus a spirit? Jesus is not a spirit! Jesus is a person, a man, with flesh like ours, but full of glory. Jesus has the wounds on His hands, feet, sides, and when He prays to the Father He shows the price of justification, praying for us, as if to say: Father, let this not be lost! (Link:


Thank you Duane for showing this video to us, so loud and clear! Your pope is indeed telling that Jesus is a man, with flesh like ours. Jesus is a man even he is gone. His homily is about the humanity of Jesus even he is gone. NO WONDER, Bro. Eli will not keep quiet on this kind of pronouncement. It contradicts the Bible! Poor Duane, he just gave Bro. Eli’s blog a lift instead of refuting it.


Duane wrote: When Pope Francis was saying “Jesus is not a spirit”, he is actually being faithful to the teaching of the bible.


Oh my, this man is lost! The pronouncement is unbiblical and yet still faithful to the teaching of the Bible? Mr. Duane, you are grossly blinded!


Duane wrote: If you believe that Jesus is a spirit, you are actually saying that Jesus does not have a flesh. BUT HE DOES. And if you go back and read what the Pope was saying in his homily, you will find out that he was actually talking about the essential value of the flesh of Jesus for our redemption. Jesus came in this world in the flesh (1 Timothy 3:16).


Now you are assuming wrongfully Mr. Duane. Your thinking is not the same as ours. We believe that Jesus is a spirit and not a man. He manifested in flesh. And as of this moment he is not in flesh anymore as your pope’s homily and your own conclusion.


Duane wrote: Remember that when Jesus roused from the dead he was not a spirit or a ghost he had an actual body.


The Pope said, Jesus is a person, a man, withflesh (body) like ours but full of glory. Isn’t this what glorious body actually mean?


So to Mr. Duane, an actual body = glorious body = flesh = man = not a spirit. How could be it glorious if you still have arthritis and all sort of illnesses since you are still in flesh (can feel pain/sorrows/etc)? It absurd and it is not glorious either.


Duane wrote: This interpretation is far from relevant in the topic if we use much clearer translations from 16 So then, from this point on we won’t recognize people by human standards. Even though we used to know Christ by human standards, that isn’t how we know him now. (CEB) 16 So from now on, we do not look at anyone from a worldly viewpoint. Even if we once regarded the Messiah from a worldly viewpoint, we do so no longer.(CJB) 16 From now on, therefore, we regard no one according to the flesh.Even though we once regarded Christ according to the flesh, we regard him thus no longer. (ESV) Are you still shock? The Pope maybe just too deep for some non-Catholics, so that he is misunderstood.


DEEP? Is that deep already? You just use other translation and for you is it deep? Your pope homily is not deep nor shallow, it is MISLEADING! And he misunderstood the Bible and the followers as well.


Duane wrote: Or some non-Catholics are too shallow that they cannot understand a basic Catholic homily.


WE understand so much that is why we LEAVE your church. It is false.


Duane wrote: Just an afterthought, have you seen the faces of those who were watching the video, none of them appeared to be shock at all. It was basic catholic catechism. They understood exactly that there was nothing new in what the Pope was saying.


Actually Duane, they are not watching the video, they were present at that homily, you blind! Yes they understood exactly that there was nothing new, cause from the very beginning of your church you propagated false doctrines, whatever comes now is also false. That is basic logic.


Luk_6:43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.


Let the Pope speak for himself, nice try Duane.


3. Third is the response of Bro. Duane to attacks of Eli Soriano against the Catholic Church.


Ahahahha..LOL! Duane, what are you doing? Who understand you by writing all of this stuff? You are speaking in the AIR man!


1Co 14:9 So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air.


Try to refute Bro. Eli by posting Hebrew words? WHY NOT EXPLAIN so everybody will understand? But if you cannot refute by explaining your point in common language, the Bible has something to say to you, Mr. Duane:


1Co 14:28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.


Whatever translations you use, your Church is idolaters! You cannot change the fact that you worship graven images.


You know, the more you boast yourself as superb in Hebrew language the more you look fool to wise readers.


If I were you, I will follow the Bible’s advice. KEEP SILENT!


Note: This post is originally posted as comment to this blog.


The Catholic priest is trembling too!

September 10, 2014

The other person that trembling so much in pain and shame as far as the post is concerned dated August 14, 2014 in their ‘splendor blog’ claiming that it was a response to Sis. Jane Abao’s “Bro. Eli, Pope Francis and the Squid Tactics of Roman Catholic Lackeys” is none other than the priest, Mr. Abe A.


He is trembling so much and no other way to counter Bro. Eli’s arguments regarding pope’s pronouncement but to post his old-style, malicious and un-respectful style of blogging against the person of Bro. Eli and now Sis Jane Abao. How poor this priest is, scarce in wisdom but full of sarcasm!


The poor and wisdom-less priest said that Bro. Eli is hiding because of the rape case —-


I said: If Bro. Eli is hiding, why people see him worldwide in 1000+ satellites, heard him in television and radio, watch him in live-streaming in internet? A simple logic yet the poor priest cannot comprehend. And for your information priest abe, as if you did not know the reason why Bro. Eli went abroad, he was sent by God to preach the true gospel worldwide. It seems you really love to talk about the rape case fabricated by INC, have not you Mr. Priest? And in your dirty mind, Bro. Eli is guilty already. For your information, the Bible said ‘the wicked shall not understand…’ and so why Bro. Eli understands the Bible? If you do not believe about that prophecy it is your lost not ours.


The poor and wisdom-less priest said that Bro. Eli’s followers are blind—-


I said: I am myself is spiritually blind when I was in the Catholic Church, but when I heard the preaching of Bro. Eli, I knew it is God who preaches. To cut the story short, I was blind before but now I can see. Many members of MCGI were catholic before: drunkard, killers, drug-addict, gossiper, womanizer, money-lover, self-centered, idolaters, etc. – but now after hearing Bro. Eli’s preaching – they are godly and faithfully serving the true God of the Bible.


The poor and wisdom-less priest said that sis Jane Abao is shallow –


I said: That’s why you joined forces to malign Sis Jane because of her shallowness? Who will believe you priest? If there is one stupid and all malicious names you had called to Sis Jane and Bro. Eli, it was you splendor1618 aka Abe. A, you are stupid because you listen to devil, only devil have the guts to do the things you have done in your site, it’s the devil who hate people doing good and it’s the devil that create false doctrines, he is a LIAR. And you are following the likes of the devil. Am I wrong in thinking you are son of him? You still have time to think priest.


The poor and wisdom-less priest said that Bro. Eli claimed he is a great debater —


I said: If you have evidence that Bro. Eli claimed that he is a great debater, show It! If you cannot – you are indeed a great liar spendor1618, you put your lies to Bro. Eli’s mouth, shame on you.


Bro. Eli, is indeed a great debater but he never claims he is. He knows where to stand. The footages of his debate with other sects and claimed-Christian denominations are proof that none can beat him Biblically speaking. Bro. Eli has the guts, the style, the knowledge and wisdom to be a great debater of this time. Just get a permit to your pope poor-priest and bring your balls in the debate, if you have balls to carry.


The poor and wisdom-less priest said that Bro. Eli can answer all questions thrown at him —


I said: I do believe Bro. Eli said these lines instead, that he can answer all the questions thrown at him regarding religion and salvation the Bible have an answers. Anyway all questions thrown by the visitors in Bible Exposition as far as I know were all answered by Bro. Eli, even those not related to religion and salvation, and most of the visitors who asked questions were catholics. They are asking because the priest cannot respond Biblically. They are seeking for the best advice – advice from the Bible – word of God.


The accusation of this priest against Bro. Eli is baseless and hopeless. This priest is righteous in his own understanding. This priest is too jealous of something that wicked cannot have. This priest cannot accept the fact that the preaching of Bro. Eli is spreading worldwide and MCGI is growing everyday.


Wake-up Mr. Abe for your soul’s sake!



“Obey your conscience. That is your guide to what is right and what is wrong.”


Hopeless to defend the pope by priest Abe in his pronouncement, the priest had to coat the claim that the Italian journalist has no proof or evidence (video or recorder) that testified the truthfulness of the said pronouncement.

From the blog:
The Pope’s letter to Scalfari that Vatican calls “non-believer,” said –
I now wish to address the three questions from your article of 7 August. I believe that in the first two questions, what interests you is to understand the attitude of the Church towards those who do not share faith in Jesus. Above all, you ask if the God of Christians forgives those who do not believe and who do not seek faith. Given the premise, and this is fundamental, that the mercy of God is limitless for those who turn to him with a sincere and contrite heart, the issue for the unbeliever lies in obeying his or her conscience. There is sin, even for those who have no faith, when conscience is not followed. Listening to and obeying conscience means deciding in the face of what is understood to be good or evil. It is on the basis of this choice that the goodness or evil of our actions is determined.


The priest cannot escape on this statements, he is just misleading the readers by calling Bro. Eli and Sis Jane of all sort of names that pointed on him. But the truth is, the pope really said that. And he opened the rape case again, he really like rape cases didn’t he?


Everyone has the right for his own opinion, why not Bro. Eli on his Biblical opinion. Do not forget your pope is a public figure, a leader – a spiritual leader for many Catholics. What an escape when you said that it is useless for the pope to explain using the Bible if he speaking to non-believer? Are you saying that quoting the Bible is useless if you speak to non-believers? Is the Bible made only to believers? Are not the ultimate goodness and pure conscious are found in the Bible, where GOD’s words are written? Or your pope cannot rely on the Bible for he do not know how to engage if he speaks to non-believers?


You know Mr. Splendor, it is UNETHICAL to anyone to call a man an idiot if he know nothing about him. It is UNETHICAL and UN-BIBLICAL to anyone to give high regard to a fool but is not and vise versa. And if you do not want to be contested by anyone, do not speak something that is contestable. In the beginning of your blog you are implying that Scalfari is a liar being an atheist and later on you are telling he is an intellectual heavyweight like your pope. Is this mean, a liar is also an intellectual heavyweight? Just asking.


Hey Priest, Bro. Eli need not to pretend he is knowledgeable –cause his knowledge is illuminating in every corner of this earth. He need not to write Scalfari for an interview or whatsoever in your mind because he is so busy preaching worldwide. If Scalfari need to know about Bro. Eli, about religion and faith, he can just turn on his media devices and presto he can hear Bro. Eli, he can ask questions about faith, religion, etc. Whatever Scalfari’s doubt, no-doubt that it will be answered by Bro.Eli. And I know you know that as well, you are just denying the fact.


In a world of lies, truth are not welcome, they maybe expose sooner, and that will be the end of line. This priest unwanted the truth to be heard, cause he is living in the world of lies where he is one of the propagator. The Biblical opinion of Bro. Eli is very unwelcome to these people who do not want to see anymore. Sorry Mr, Priest, you cannot stop Bro. Eli in doing so, because he is after the soul of many people blinded for so long, for his mission is to open their eyes.


The priest said, there is no fallacy in their doctrines —- maybe in their dream. Well if we talk about the fallacy of Roman Catholic Church, they were numerous. Since this priest claimed that RCC developed its education, science, arts, music and literature that make them champion in logical reasoning, analytic studies and deductive analysis – no doubt why their doctrine is not of God but of men. Cause the truth where  logical thinking and reasoning must be based shall comes from the east. The sun shines in the east and not in the west. Christians comes from east not in Rome.


“He believes in God but not in the Catholic god.”


Whether it is Catholic God or Catholic god, the pope believes not.
I do not know why the priest is so damned to understand this. Why in the world Pope Francis said that if there is no comparison at all. Come on Mr. Priest, your pope is comparing two things here, the God and the Catholic God. Whether your creed started to ‘I believe in God…” you cannot change the meaning of what pope Francis had been said that made media shocked. Actually I do believed even you are shocked to death on this, you are just denying. You know Mr. Priest, whether your pope is the greatest professor of the greatest university on earth, the truth remain the same. Whether he is the greatest man on earth alive, the truth is “the wicked shall not understand but the wise will”. We really do not care if your pope’s book is best selling, cause if not, you should  very worry. Bro. Eli need not to compile or write a book cause the BIBLE tell it all. He is preaching the Bible. How about your pope?


Mr. Priest, the more you degrade Bro. Eli, the more he is elevated by many. He maybe undergraduate or no degree in any university of men, but still the truth is – he has given wisdom to preach the word of God. And no preachers today have the guts to debunked your pope’s pronouncement. And no preachers today have the guts and the knowledge to preach the true gospel of Lord Jesus Christ worldwide. You know nothing about him but to malign and call him vicious names that only devil’s advocate can do. You are a shame to your congregation splendor1618, whoever you are, whatever you are. I am sorry to say this to you, but I will still say that you deserve God’s punishment when that day comes if you not change your heart.

Note: This is posted originally as comment in this blog.